New CA Torts Case

 

 

 

I can help. I've been a California civil trial lawyer since 1980, a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates since 1995, and I've been listed in The Best Lawyers in America every year since 2012. I've represented both plaintiffs and defendants in business, insurance bad faith and coverage, personal injury, real property and wrongful death cases, I've recovered over $50 million for plaintiff clients, and obtained numerous defense verdicts and good settlements for defense clients. I've tried over 100 jury, court and administrative trials and arbitrations. For many years, I've provided mentoring to many less experienced lawyers in California.

 

Working with me, you can quickly develop the skills, strategies, and systems necessary to build you dream law practice. How will it feel to be a successful and highly respected lawyer in your practice areas? Today is the day to start creating your future. 

 

Click the link to learn more about Master Lawyer Mentoring™, or email me at [email protected] or call me at (619) 990-4312.

 

To get my free summaries of the 22 new civil cases published by the California Supreme Court in 2021, click here.

Below is a discussion of a new CA civil case published last month.

Landowner Tort Duty

California landowners often owe a duty of care to people on their property. Last month, the Second District Court of Appeal published a decision addressing the issue of whether a landowner owes a duty of care for an open and obvious risk. Whether a risk is open and obvious will often be a question of fact that will preclude the granting of a motion for summary judgment. In this case, however, the parties agreed the risk was open and obvious. A video discussing the case is above and my summary of the case is below.

New Torts Decision  

Montes v. Young Men's Christian Assn. of Glendale (2022) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2022 WL 3053305: The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment in plaintiffs' wrongful action for the death of their son. Decedent Abel Montes, Jr., fell to his death from the steep, sloped roof of a residential building where he lived, owned by defendant. Mr. Montes had been drinking and had eaten a marijuana brownie earlier, was feeling high, and had been acting erratically before the fall. The parties agreed there was an "open and obvious risk" from the roof sloped at a steep angle and covered with brittle, broken, slippery and unstable Spanish tiles. They also agreed there was no need for Mr. Montes to be on the roof. The Court of Appeal concluded that, under these circumstances, defendant owed no duty of care to Mr. Montes and the trial court properly granted the motion for summary judgment. (C.A. 2nd, August 3, 2022.)